Organizational Power or Politics Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Organizational Power or Politics - Term Paper Example They should serve as guiding principles for the success of an organization and particularly in managing and empowering employees. Power is such an important element for the success of an organization, but it is a broad concept at the same time. It could either harm or help an organization depending on how it is implemented. In the context of an organization, it is defined as the ability to do or acquire something (Nelson & Quick, 2011). In this definition, power is concerned on the capacity of an individual to influence and employ authority over a certain organization or group. In other words, there is a clear distinction between power, influence and authority. Power is the ability, influence is a process and authority is the right of a person to create impact on the lives of others (Nelson & Quick, 2011). Power can be significantly viewed as the ability to influence and employ one’s authority. Thus, power should consist of combined ability to apply influence and authority. It is in this reason why power is such an important concept that for a long period of time continues to be one of the most signific ant issues that need to be taken into account in leadership and other related essential activities within an organization. In this paper, the proponent tries to discuss and analyze the basic and essential concepts of power and political behavior in an organization based on the ideas of Nelson and Quick. The essay starts with the discussion of their ideas on power and political behavior, followed by analysis and conclusion. Nelson and Quick discuss important issues regarding power and political behavior primary within the context of a group or an organization. First, they place substantial distinction among the concepts of power, influence and authority. For them, each of these has different impact and usage. A manager may have the right to take control over employees but this would not

Legal case study memorandum Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Legal memorandum - Case Study Example 2. Forestland and Ecoland is both signatory of GWA that requires reduction in carbon emissions. The two states have devised measures to deal with the issue. Forestland have built on dams and Ecoland have introduced ECTR, patent and labeling regulations. 3. ECTR levy tax depending on the level of carbon emissions with the higher the carbon the higher the tax. ECTR classify RecycloFuel as carbon-neutral manner („BCNs‟), while ForestFuel as non-carbon-neutral manner (BCs‟) on the grounds that forest fuel powered by hydroelectricity emits carbon emission. Nevertheless, there is no conclusive evidence that this is true (Prezi, 2015). 4. Eco-labeling mandates the labeling of the products depending on the fuel used. Products made from RecycloFuel are labeled using a â€Å"happy marmot† label, product made from ForestFuel have â€Å"unhappy marmot† label and products made from fossil fuels have â€Å"furry marmot unfriendly† 5. Section 66. 6 requires no patent to inventions directed in prevention of commercial exploitation in which it is necessary to protect the public or morality comprising of animal and plant life or health, humans or to avoid grave consequences on the environment. 6. Ecoland in this case wish to protect, a special species, marmot that helps in distribution of Ecolandian Fir tree, the main source of biofuel. The climate has changed in the last five years with a drop in ski slopes and global warming that has consequently saw a reduction in Fir trees. In this effort, Ecoland is trying to have eco-label to protect the environment. The Indonesia government brought the case forward to the panel in respect to clove cigarette labeling regulations. US in this case had prohibited production and sales of cigarette with cloves. The panel ruled out that the aimed at improving public health to smokers. Canada and Mexico brought a case the TBT panel in regard to the action of US on labeling regulation. The